| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Maureen Site Admin
Joined: 20 Aug 2008 Posts: 200
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:39 pm Post subject: Clearwire Promises Expansions to Chicago, Vegas, and more |
|
|
At last, the news we've all been waiting for... official word from Clearwire on a build-out plan!
Clearwire announced today that they plan to launch Clear in the following 8 markets this year:
Atlanta
Las Vegas
Chicago
Charlotte
Dallas/Ft. Worth
Honolulu
Philadelphia
Seattle
And another 70 in 2010, including Boston, New York, Washington, D.C., Houston and San Francisco.
Those are lofty goals - let's cross our fingers that they manage to pull it off before their money runs out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sirwoogie 4G User
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 33 Location: MI
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing for Southeast Michigan.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wakeman91 4G User
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 45 Location: Chicago - next to the 'cell
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
You emphasize this year as though its something new. They've been saying Chicago would be launched "this year" since last September. And I've been dealing with its inconsistancy on transferring large files since January. All this despite the claims that Chicago is currently their biggest build-out.
I think Honolulu was the only news-worthy city on the list, speculations were already pretty high on NY and SF for 2010 since they need to hit a popluation milestone in order to fulfill the gov't mandate on the spectrum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sirwoogie 4G User
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 33 Location: MI
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:31 pm Post subject: Re: Clearwire Promises Expansions to Chicago, Vegas, and mor |
|
|
| Maureen wrote: | | let's cross our fingers that they manage to pull it off before LTE completely negates their deployment advantage. |
I fixed the quote.
Seriously, 10 city deployments total for this entire year is not a significant deployment to stave off the LTE deployment looming overhead. Perhaps I'm bitter my area is not on the list. But what this all amounts to thus far has been a large bag of spin and empty delivery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jackofall 4G User
Joined: 26 Oct 2008 Posts: 80 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ok.. Let's forget about 2009.. Let's focus on next...Clear will stiill be ahead of VZW by Mid year... I believe they will be two steps ahead of the game for a few years... This is Clear's only focus.. VZW has a lot to deal with.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isamu 4G User
Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Will Los Angeles customers fall under the Las Vegas service? Will it work in the Anaheim/Santa Ana area? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hw711 4G Fledgling
Joined: 26 Oct 2008 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 2009 is 1/4 over and they haven't launched in a single city yet. I don't know how they are on schedule for 8 cities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DeltaSPARTAN003 4G Fledgling
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 Posts: 16 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really hope Seattle isn't delayed. I've been waiting 2 years! I switched to Sprint because of WiMax!
But, I reallly hope that New Clearwire doesn't frak this up. With Clearwire owning most of the 2.5 Ghz spectrum, there is no reason they could ever be able to falter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|