| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Maureen Site Admin
Joined: 20 Aug 2008 Posts: 200
|
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:24 pm Post subject: CLEAR performance testing results |
|
|
3Gstore (4Ginfo's sister site) has completed testing of CLEAR in Chicago, Austin, and Las Vegas, and were very happy with what we saw! Check out our thoughts and test results here.
If you use CLEAR (either directly from CLEAR or one of the companies that re-sells their service, like Sprint, Comcast, etc etc), post your speedtest results and other thoughts about the service here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
4g Driven Banned User
Joined: 07 Aug 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:31 am Post subject: 4g |
|
|
| Want to resell Clear Wimax? Check out this site [url]wix.com/4gdriven/4g[/url] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
4gtex 4G Newbie
Joined: 18 Aug 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Clear 4G - Austin TX.
100% Signal (-56 dbm).
15.09Mb/s Download
0.99Mb/s Upload (throttled by Clear)
72ms Ping Latency
Setup:
Modem = Clear / Ubee PXU1900
Antenna = Clear USB Performance Dock (improves signal from 80% to 100%)
4G Router = CTR-500 (1.7.0, 5.2.216)
External AP connected to CTR-500 for better performance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kfede1 4G Newbie
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:57 pm Post subject: Clear notwork not so clear? |
|
|
I spent roughly 3 hours on the phone with Clear Customer support, mostly repeating the same story over and over again until they all got it. The tower in my neighborhood has some major issues. It seldom works at all, but when it does even give a signal, it has some issue with DNS and can not seem to resolve addresses. The tower is several hundred feet away and a clear line of site, so it is not a range issue. I received 3 different devices, all of which showed the same symptoms. Anyway, I took one of the hots[pots and headed to a different tower to prove to these "Genius"s they needed to fix the tower. (The device worked as advertised for the most part on other towers) There response was that they only had a few complaints thus far. (Of course they probably only have a few customers thus far) Not till there were more complaint would they consider sending someone out. Anyway, they also said they did not work weekends or holidays on the equipment. I am not a huge AT&T fan, but they seem to address issues when they occur very quickly. I can't see Clear making it if they have such a cavalier attitude towards meeting SLAs. I am going to give them a chance to show they can be relied on, but so far I have been w/out Clear services for 3 days. Luckily, I retained my AT&T service.
Finally, I drove out of the neighborhood and tested the signal in other areas marked as 4g in their map Many areas in the map came up as RED (Poor signal) but did work, albeit at slightly better than (old style) modem speeds. As often, I got a Yellow indicator and the throughput was reasonabl, maybe 25% of what was advertised. When I got a green signal near another tower, I hit 9+ megabits down and 900Kb up. That I could live with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kfede1 4G Newbie
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:28 pm Post subject: Clear / Sprint Support issues |
|
|
I spent well over an hour talking to level 1 support today. They closed the ticket I took 3 hours to get open Friday. After being told for over an hour by level 1 that the tower is working and talking to a supervisor for 15 minutes, I finally got level 2 support. They told me that the tower has known issues and it may take several weeks before they intend to address it. The equipment is dropping packets like crazy. I asked why level 1 support has now wasted over 4 of my hours doing things that made no difference and could have been skipped if they just knew the tower was down. He told me that they did not like level 1 to know when the towers were down because they might tell the customers instead of making us go through all this effort. Thank you Clear, thank you Sprint for such considerate use of my time.
BTW, since the repair date for the tower is mid October, I am cancelling Clear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
4gtex 4G Newbie
Joined: 18 Aug 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does seem to be dependent on the area. I'm in a different area in Austin than my previous post, and even with the exact same equipment setup, and full signal strength (10 bars, 100%, -76dBm), I get consistently much slower speed test results.
Anyone know some keywords when talking to Clear to get them to fix the tower to improve performance? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
evdomatt 4Ginfo Employee
Joined: 21 Jun 2010 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 4gtex wrote: | It does seem to be dependent on the area. I'm in a different area in Austin than my previous post, and even with the exact same equipment setup, and full signal strength (10 bars, 100%, -76dBm), I get consistently much slower speed test results.
Anyone know some keywords when talking to Clear to get them to fix the tower to improve performance? |
The speeds you're receiving are still really good! It's possible that the tower you're connecting to has more users than usual. They probably won't do anything to fix it at this point because you're still getting speeds above their standard 3-6Mbps down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
4gtex 4G Newbie
Joined: 18 Aug 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| evdomatt wrote: | | The speeds you're receiving are still really good! It's possible that the tower you're connecting to has more users than usual. They probably won't do anything to fix it at this point because you're still getting speeds above their standard 3-6Mbps down. |
What I would like to see though is their advertised 1Mbps upload speed, which I used to get in another area of town. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
evdomatt 4Ginfo Employee
Joined: 21 Jun 2010 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 4gtex wrote: | | evdomatt wrote: | | The speeds you're receiving are still really good! It's possible that the tower you're connecting to has more users than usual. They probably won't do anything to fix it at this point because you're still getting speeds above their standard 3-6Mbps down. |
What I would like to see though is their advertised 1Mbps upload speed, which I used to get in another area of town. |
Yes, I agree that 1Mbps is certainly more attractive than 500Kbps. However, that's still a pretty attractive upload speed from a wireless carrier. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Osage4g 4G Fledgling
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The tests that I would rather see would have to come from Clear users that used to be on sprint 3G.
Because that would somewhat answer range to the tower issues if someone had poor performance from Sprint 3G due to a fairly low signal but now get much better results on clear 4G using the exact same tower.
It may not answer the overloaded tower question, because its my understanding a 4G tower can handle more traffic than a 3G tower. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
evdomatt 4Ginfo Employee
Joined: 21 Jun 2010 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Osage4g wrote: | The tests that I would rather see would have to come from Clear users that used to be on sprint 3G.
Because that would somewhat answer range to the tower issues if someone had poor performance from Sprint 3G due to a fairly low signal but now get much better results on clear 4G using the exact same tower.
It may not answer the overloaded tower question, because its my understanding a 4G tower can handle more traffic than a 3G tower. |
4G tower locations do have more spectrum and bandwidth available to them. However, in the first test markets they didn't roll out nearly as much backhaul and bandwidth that newer locations offer.
If you look at the newer markets the average speeds are much higher than markets that were in the initial roll out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Osage4g 4G Fledgling
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| evdomatt wrote: | | Osage4g wrote: | The tests that I would rather see would have to come from Clear users that used to be on sprint 3G.
Because that would somewhat answer range to the tower issues if someone had poor performance from Sprint 3G due to a fairly low signal but now get much better results on clear 4G using the exact same tower.
It may not answer the overloaded tower question, because its my understanding a 4G tower can handle more traffic than a 3G tower. |
4G tower locations do have more spectrum and bandwidth available to them. However, in the first test markets they didn't roll out nearly as much backhaul and bandwidth that newer locations offer.
If you look at the newer markets the average speeds are much higher than markets that were in the initial roll out. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sadly evdomatt, your comment does not address my question of 3G v 4G range. If the range of a 3G tower is not enough to service a given user, then the 4G tower range has to increase or clear 4G will not be any better than sprint 3G regardless of improved back haul.
As for me I ask the question from a Virgin Mobile give it a shot perspective. If my Virgin Mobile 3G connection is weak, why should a sprint 3 G connection be any better? (especially since both sprint and Virgin Mobile promised me a stellar signal and lied. But given the possibility that sprint clear branded 4G may be first to arrive in my area, its only going to be an option for me if a clear 4G signal has more range than its equivalent 3G signal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
simcity 4G Newbie
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:36 am Post subject: Clear Speed test |
|
|
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1002181494.png
This speed test was performed in Brooklyn, NY with 4g+ hotspot router.
Clear and Sprint will bring 4g in NYC on November 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|